Topic: Lit Review

Order Description Research question:What are the effective models to support the healthy transition between active duty service and civilian life? For this forum, we will be requiring a specific format for the submission, not unlike what you will need to provide if you are submitting an annotated bibliography as your final project. There are two purposes for this assignment: to provide you with a chance for feedback under the same sort of conditions as your final project to help everyone in the class to build their own bibliographies We will also use the same sort of protocol as for the final project, except that one major error will cause your submission to be returned "unread." There are four major error responses: APA formatting error If you pass this requirement on this forum, you may still have minor typos to be corrected. You should resubmit to correct them. However, some of the common errors, such as title case rather than sentence case in titles, full names in authors, or wrong order of citation elements will cause this red flag to be thrown. Not an abstract Make sure you know the difference between an abstract and an annotation. Not an annotation Make sure you know the difference between an abstract and an annotation. Not professionally written A minor typo won't cause a problem, but errors in tense, register, grammar, or inappropriate style will cause this red flag to be thrown. This is a cooperative learning experience. Use peer reviews before submission, and feel free to jump in and help your fellow students. Format for annotated bibliography submission (note that you should follow the Saybrook style guide for reports with two exceptions: Don't use paragraph indention, hanging or otherwise. Also, since you are using an HTML-based editor, everything is in single space with a blank line between paragraphs): Citation in BOLD face, but otherwise in Saybrook/APA References format [Include example citation as in the article assignment] <blank line> Abstract: (in bold) Abstract in non-bolded text. Your abstract should be between 100 and 200 words, and ideally it will be toward the short end of that range. An abstract is a summary of the content of the bibliographic item. You are normally reporting, not evaluating, in an abstract. Tell me what the author(s) covered: what's the date range of the content, whether it covers popular or scholarly material, what are the methodological orientation(s). <blank line> Annotation: (in bold) Annotation in non-bolded text. Your annotation should be between 100 and 200 words, and ideally it will be toward the short end of that range. Annotations are evaluations. Tell me about the quality of the work, its comprehensiveness, and its credibility. Note: I'm not interested in the credibility of the author(s), except where exception authorial credibility might buttress a particularly "chancy" methodological approach, or where context might explain some unusual aspect of the work. <blank line> -- Your name (e.g.: -- Walt Knowles) Your name, at the end, is so that other students can copy your whole annotated bibliography entry into their own private annotated bibliography as a future learning resource, and still know (and give credit to, if appropriate) the author of the annotation.