Topic: Reading Response
Order Description
According to resources to answer the questions.
1. What is “commodification of language”?
2. “Lip service on the fantasy line” (Hall 1995) and “Styling the worker” (Cameron 2000) share a few similar findings:
2.1 In the training manuals examined in the two studies, one linguistic strategy is recommended for both phone sex workers and call center workers. What is it?
2.2 One kind of linguistic style is commodified in both studies. What is it?
2.3 In both studies, speakers use the above style of language to perform what kind of labor?
3. The linguistic style that is commodified in these two studies was also found in another study we read recently. What is the study (article title and author)?
11/10/15
1
Reminder
¤ Pre-‐announced
test
5
on
Tu.
Nov.
17
by
9:15AM.
¤ Response
Paper
due
on
Th
Nov.
19,
by
9:15AM
in
D2L
Dropbox.
1
Language,
Gender
and
Political
Economy
Nov.10,
2015
Approaches
Introduced
¤ Dominance
approach
¤ Cultural
difference
(cross-‐cultural)
approach
¤ PracLce-‐based
approach
¤ Performing
gender
3
Relationships
between
Language
and
Gender
¤ Language
reflects
gender
(relaLons,
orders,
categories,
idenLLes,
peer
cultures,
etc.)
¤ Language
indexes,
constructs
gender
(idenLLes,
categories,
relaLons,
etc.)
4
Language,
Gender
and
Political
Economy
¤ PoliLcal
Economy?
§ Poli)cal:
systems
of
power
§ Economy:
various
economies,
or
systems
of
exchange
–
financial,
material,
symbolic,
interacLonal,
cultural,
etc.
§ Poli)cal
economy
involves
resource
allocaLon
in
the
sense,
for
example,
of
control
over
goods.
PoliLcal
economy
involves
the
generic
economic
processes
of
the
producLon,
distribuLon,
and
consumpLon
of
goods,
including
"non-‐material"
ones,
and
the
paVerns
and
culture
of
power
that
control
or
influence
these
processes
(Friedrich
1989:298).
5
Language
and
Political
Economy
¤ Locate
linguisLc
pracLces
in
larger
systems
of
power
and
economic
processes
¤ View
linguisLc
skills/pracLces
as
providing
access
to
valuable
(material)
resources
differenLally
distributed
6
11/10/15
2
Language
and
Political
Economy
¤ Research
quesLons:
§ Which
linguisLc
markets
do
speakers
parLcipate
in?
§ What
is
the
value
–
symbolic,
pracLcal,
and
economic
–
of
the
various
linguisLc
varieLes
and
language
used
within
the
community?
§ Which
linguisLc
varieLes
or
languages
are
legiLmated,
i.e.,
taught
in
schools,
used
by
the
media,
rewarded
by
various
societal
gatekeepers,
etc.?
§ What
sorts
of
resistance
to
legiLmated
language
exist
within
the
community
?
7
Language
and
Political
Economy
¤ Research
quesLons
conLnued
§ How
is
access
to
the
varieLes
of
language
used
in
the
community
unequally
distributed?
§ How
is
this
unequal
access
linked
to
membership
in
socio-‐demographic
groups?
§ How
are
linguisLc
markets
and
parLcipaLon
in
them
Led
to
larger
system
of
power
and
dominance
in
such
domains
as
economy,
poliLcs,
religion,
and
educaLon?
8
Case
Study
1:
“Peasant
men
can’t
get
wives:
Language
and
sex
roles
in
a
bilingual
community”
¤ Susan
Gal
9
“Peasant
men
can’t
get
wives”
¤ What
is
the
linguisLc
and
social
situaLon
in
Oberwart,
Austria
in
the
1970s?
¤ What
are
the
symbolic
meanings
associated
with
the
languages/codes
in
Oberwart?
¤ ImplicaLonal
scale
10
“Peasant
men
can’t
get
wives”
¤ Language
choice
paVers
found
(Table
1,
2,
3)
¤ What
are
the
three
important
factors
in
predicLng
language
choice
and
changes
that
were
happening
in
Oberwart?
¤ Gender
paVerns.
Who
are
leading
the
change
from
Hungarian-‐German
bilingual
to
German
dominant?
And
why?
(Figure
1)
¤ Marriage
paVerns
can
also
indirectly
affect
the
outcome
of
language
shic
in
Oberwart.
In
what
way?
(Table
4)
¤ What
does
this
study
tell
us
about
the
relaLon
between
language
choice/change,
social
change
and
gender?
11
Two
cases
of
commodification
of
language
¤ CommodificaLon
of
language:
LinguisLc
pracLces
or
socially
laden
languages
and
dialects
are
produced
and
sold
as
commodiLes.
¤ What
kind
of
linguisLc
style,
or
language,
is
valued
and
commodified
in
the
two
cases,
and
in
both
cases,
speakers
use
language
to
perform
what
kind
of
labor?
1. Lip
service
on
the
fantasy
line
(Hall
1995)
2. Call
centers
in
the
UK
(Cameron
2000)
11/10/15
3
Empowerment?
Devaluation?
¤ In
each
case,
we
can
see
that
a
parLcular
language
variety
or
linguisLc
style
creates
economic
benefit
for
the
company
and/or
an
individual.
At
the
same
Lme,
certain
linguisLc
resource
is
devalued.
What
is
devalued
in
each
case?
“Lip
Service
on
the
Fantasy
Lines”
(Hall
1995)
¤ If
the
fantasy
industry
consLtutes
a
type
of
linguisLc
marketplace,
what
are
the
linguisLc
resources
that
are
valuable
on
such
a
market?
¤ In
the
training
manual,
in
the
secLon
“Create
different
characters”,
look
at
the
different
characters
suggested
by
the
manual
on
pp.
190-‐1.
What
does
it
tell
us
about
the
fact
that
most
women
fantasy
makers
are
able
to
create
these
characters
through
verbal
messages?
14
“Lip
Service
on
the
Fantasy
Lines”
¤ In
Start
a
conversa2on
(p.191),
what
is
the
general
strategy
to
start
a
conversaLon
as
shown
in
the
examples?
¤ As
shown
in
(1),
(2)
and
(3),
what
ideologies
do
fantasy-‐line
operators
appropriate
in
their
phone
talk?
¤ How
do
the
fantasy
operators
make
their
language
marketable?
¤ What
does
this
study
tell
us
about
the
relaLon
between
language,
gender,
and
power?
15
Styling
the
Worker
(Cameron
2000)
¤ Customer
service
in
the
UK
¤ What
did
Cameron
find?
Training
materials
on
ways
of
using
language:
“bear
a
striking
resemblance
to
ways
of
speaking
that
are
associated,
in
popular
imaginaLon
and
also
in
some
instances
by
empirical
research,
with
women
speakers”
(p.
337)
¤ Using
“expressive
language”
to
perform
what
kind
of
labor?
¤ Devaluing
“Women’s
Language”?
16